Research on the Impact of Carbon Credit Policy on Household Electronic Waste Recycling Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202611_7(11).0007Keywords:
Carbon Credit Policy; Household Electronic Waste; Behavior of Recycling.Abstract
With the promotion of the "dual carbon" goal, the Carbon Credit Policy has been gradually implemented, and the pilot program has been carried out relying on the platform of carbon credits policy. At present, there are problems of resource waste and environmental pollution in the treatment and recycling of household electronic waste. Based on this background, this paper explores the impact of carbon credits policy on household electronic waste. Typical application cases include Alipay Ant Forest, Chengdu Carbon Huitianfu and Haier Zhijia APP, etc. This study builds theoretical models based on the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior, and tests the hypotheses through empirical analysis. The conclusion is that the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of carbon credit policy have a positive impact on environmental protection attitude, environmental protection attitude will positively affect the recycling intention of household e-waste and positively promote recycling behavior, and carbon credit policy will positively affect consumers' subjective norms and positively promote recycling intention and behavior. Based on the empirical conclusions, this paper puts forward practical suggestions to promote the recycling of household electronic products and enhance consumers' enthusiasm for carbon reduction.
Downloads
References
[1] Huang, R. Q. (2026). Anchoring the development goal of "the 15th Five-Year Plan" to promote the new great progress of Beautiful China Construction. Ecological Civilization of China, (2), 6–8.
[2] Zhao, X., & Gao, C. (2020). Research on driving mechanism and configuration of low-carbon behavior of new energy vehicle consumers under dual carbon strategy. Journal of Soft Science.
[3] Guo, Y., & Li, X. (2018). Empirical research on consumers' willingness to use mobile payment to purchase tourism products: Based on Technology acceptance model and Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (6), 159–170.
[4] Sun, X. (2024). The impact of external characteristics of community group-buying on consumer purchasing behavior: Based on the mediating role of practical perception and easy-to-use perception. Journal of Business Economics, (20), 67–70.
[5] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[6] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[7] Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Donat, M., Kiral, U. G., et al. (2022). The role of environmental identity and individualism/collectivism in predicting climate change denial: evidence from nine countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101899
[8] Raghoebar, S., Delnoij, J., Kamphorst, B. A., et al. (2022). Exposure to images showing (non)adherence to physical distancing rules: effect on adherence behavior and perceived social norms. PLOS ONE, 17(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277447
[9] Shan, X., Kou, L., & Ji, M. (2026). Behavior mechanism of demand response bus selection considering carbon credits. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition).
[10] Zhang, Y., & Li, Z. (2025). The impact of short video digital availability on users' virtual tourism consumption intention: an analysis based on extended TAM and mediation model. Journal of Business Economics, (7), 69–72.
[11] Li, W., & Shao, J. (2020). Research on the influencing factors of consumers' purchasing behavior of environmental protection clothing: Based on the theory of planned behavior and the theory of norm activation. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 33(6), 233–244.
[12] Gao, M., & Wang, J. (2025). Discussion on influencing factors of urban residents' e-waste resource utilization behavior: Based on TPB-NAM-SET integration model. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Social Science Edition), (2), 21–30.
[13] Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
[14] Zeng, W., & Huang, B. (2005). Reliability and validity analysis of questionnaire. Statistics and Information Forum, (06), 13–17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





