The Impact of Digital Brand Engagement on Consumer Purchase Intention
A Study based on Brand Experience and Brand Attachment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202610_7(10).0010Keywords:
Digital Brand Engagement; Brand Experience; Brand Attachment; Purchase Intention; S-O-R Model.Abstract
Social media and short-video applications have changed the way brands meet their audiences, and a good deal of that contact now takes place through comment sections, live streams, and user-generated content instead of the old one-way advertising model; what has received far less attention is the psychological route that such engagement travels through before it shows up in a purchase decision. Working from the S-O-R framework, this paper traces that route from digital brand engagement to purchase intention, treating brand experience and brand attachment as two mediators arranged in sequence. The evidence comes from a literature review, case work on Pop Mart and Florasis, and questionnaire data gathered from 178 consumers, and it points to a fairly clear pattern: five kinds of digital interaction - informational, emotional, user-participation, personalized, and community/UGC - feed a multi-dimensional brand experience, the positive experience that piles up over time gives rise to brand attachment, and that attachment then feeds back into a stronger willingness to buy. For firms that want their digital engagement to work harder, the results also suggest where the practical effort is best directed.
Downloads
References
[1] Lu, B. J., Cui, X. B., He, L., & Sun, X. C. (2023). Short-video advertising and consumer purchase intention: A study based on the S-O-R theory. Journal of Information Systems, (28), 1–16.
[2] Li, J. (2025). The impact of multidimensional interaction on social media on consumers’ purchase intention. Business Economic Research, (3), 57–60.
[3] Tian, W., & Pan, J. H. (2023). An analysis of the impact of brand community identity on consumers’ purchase intention: Considering the mediating role of the peer influence effect. Business Economics Research, (14), 51–54.
[4] Nie, Y. K., Liu, L., & Cui H. L. (2024). The response mechanism of green consumption intentions: The matching effect between brand personification and product type. Technological Economics, 43(4), 88–99.
[5] Luo, L. (2023). Community e-commerce identity, brand trust, and consumer loyalty. Business Economy Research, (2), 70–73.
[6] Kuo, Y. F., & Chen, F. L. (2023). Social media marketing activity interactivity and continuous participation intentions: The S-O-R framework. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103446.
[7] Chen, C. F., & Lu, H. H. (2024). Transforming a social media influencer’s influential power to followers’ word of mouth and purchase intention: The role of brand attachment, brand credibility, and parasocial relationship. Journal of Brand Management, 31(4), 415–429.
[8] Chen, C. F., White, C., & Yu, Y. H. (2025). Brand love and digital participation: The importance of consumer citizenship in the social media era. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing, 13(2), 158–169.
[9] Khan, I. (2022). Do brands’ social media marketing activities matter? A moderation analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102794.
[10] Lin, F. L., & Ku, T. H. (2023). Effect of digital brand experience on luxury fashion brand authenticity, attachment and loyalty. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), 3583.
[11] Onofrei, G., Filieri, R., & Kennedy, L. (2022). Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors. Journal of Business Research, 142, 100–112.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





