The Turnover Rate Paradox: Market Breadth, Thematic Crowding, and Sector Rotation in the Chinese A-Share Market

Authors

  • Junxuan Luo School of Economics, Jinan University, Finance, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511436, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202610_7(10).0005

Keywords:

Turnover Paradox; Market Breadth; Sector Rotation; Investor Sentiment; Chinese A-share Market.

Abstract

High turnover is typically viewed as a sign of active capital flows and rapid asset reallocation; however, in the A-share market, it does not necessarily correspond to faster sector rotation. Using weekly data from 2021 to 2025 for the 31 Shenwan Level-1 sectors, this paper classifies market states jointly by return breadth and turnover, and examines how sentiment volatility conditions the turnover-rotation relationship.  The estimates show a clear conditional pattern. In high-breadth weeks, the marginal effect of turnover on rotation speed is -0.052. In low-breadth weeks with stable sentiment, the effect is only -0.002 and statistically insignificant. When low breadth is combined with high sentiment volatility, the effect falls to -0.034, and the negative turnover-rotation relationship reappears.iFinD-based fund-flow evidence shows that the high-turnover, low-breadth state is accompanied by concentrated estimated net institutional inflows and broad retail participation. Because lagged flow variables are not significant, these flows are interpreted as contemporaneous validation rather than as an independent causal mechanism. Turnover should therefore be read jointly with return breadth and sentiment conditions, rather than treated as a standalone signal of sector reallocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen, T. Y., Chao, C. H., & Wu, Z. X. (2021). Does the turnover effect matter in emerging markets? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 67, 101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101551

[2] Moskowitz, T. J., & Grinblatt, M. (1999). Do industries explain momentum? The Journal of Finance, 54(4), 1249–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00146

[3] Su, M. (2017). Research on industry rotation in China’s A-share market. Southern Finance, (2), 40–48. (in Chinese)

[4] Chui, A. C. W., Subrahmanyam, A., & Titman, S. (2022). Momentum, reversals, and investor clientele. Review of Finance, 26(2), 217–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac010

[5] Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x

[6] Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm079

[7] Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2011). In search of attention. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1461–1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x

[8] Birru, J., & Young, T. (2022). Sentiment and uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(3), 1148–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.05.005

[9] Jiang, F. W., Meng, L. C., & Tang, G. H. (2021). Media text sentiment and stock return prediction. China Economic Quarterly, 21(4), 1323–1344. (in Chinese)

[10] Li, Y., Zhang, Y. J., & Shen, D. H. (2026). The mediating role of stock forums in the stock market: Investor attention or sentiment? Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 46(4), 1064–1085. https://doi.org/10.12341/jssms240621

[11] Hong, C. Y., Lu, X., & Pan, J. (2025). FinTech platforms and mutual fund distribution. Management Science, 71(1), 488–517.

[12] Jones, C. M., Shi, D., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2025). Retail trading and return predictability in China. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 60(1), 68–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109024000085

[13] Tan, L., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2024). Retail and institutional investor trading behaviors: Evidence from China. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 16, 459–483. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-082123-110132

Downloads

Published

2026-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Luo, J. (2026). The Turnover Rate Paradox: Market Breadth, Thematic Crowding, and Sector Rotation in the Chinese A-Share Market. Frontiers in Economics and Management, 7(10), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202610_7(10).0005