Global Value Chain Activities in Host Country and Foreign Subsidiary Performance: The Role of Local Knowledge, Entry Model Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202511_6(11).0023Keywords:
Host Country Global Value Chain; Foreign Subsidiary Performance; Local Knowledge; Entry Mode.Abstract
This paper explores the extent to which the performance of foreign subsidiaries is affected by country, sector and company factors, using the company level panel of more than 61,000 foreign subsidiaries in 103 economies. We found evidence that the increase of GVC participation and GVC position of host countries improved the financial performance of foreign subsidiaries. This shows that the more active the host country is in the global value chain activities, the greater the market potential, so that foreign companies can obtain higher returns. The study also found that this positive return was also affected by the differences in local knowledge and entry mode strategies of foreign subsidiaries. In addition, this paper also conducted a variety of robustness tests and discussed the endogenous problem. Our findings support the basic principles of international production and division of labor and advocate that a country should participate more in global production in order to attract foreign investment.
Downloads
References
[1] Krugman, P., Cooper, R. N., & Srinivasan, T. N. (1995). Growing world trade: causes and consequences. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1995(1), 327-377.
[2] Dollar, D. R., Inomata, S., Degain, C., Meng, B., Wang, Z., Ahmad, N., ... & Kidder, M. (2017). Global value chain development report 2017: measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development.
[3] World Bank. (2019). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. The World Bank.
[4] Fernandes, A. M., Kee, H. L., & Winkler, D. (2022). Determinants of global value chain participation: Cross-country evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 36(2), 329-360.
[5] Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., Yu, X., & Zhu, K. (2021). Tracing value added in the presence of foreign direct investment (No. w29335). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[6] Gereffi, G. (1994). The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks.
[7] Gereffi, G. (2001). Beyond the producer‐driven/buyer‐driven dichotomy the evolution of global value chains in the internet era. IDS bulletin, 32(3), 30-40.
[8] Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2000). A handbook for value chain research (Vol. 113). Brighton: University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies.
[9] Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K. M. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of international Economics, 54(1), 75-96.
[10] De Backer, K., & Yamano, N. (2008). The measurement of globalisation using international input-output tables. OECD.
[11] Miroudot, S., Lanz, R., & Ragoussis, A. (2009). Trade in intermediate goods and services.
[12] Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. (2012). Estimating domestic content in exports when processing trade is pervasive. Journal of development economics, 99(1), 178-189.
[13] Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012). Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added. Journal of international Economics, 86(2), 224-236.
[14] Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. (2014). Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. American economic review, 104(2), 459-494.
[15] Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., Yu, X., & Zhu, K. (2017). Characterizing global value chains: production length and upstreamness (No. w23261). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[16] Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., Yu, X., & Zhu, K. (2017). Measures of participation in global value chains and global business cycles (No. w23222). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[17] Bohn, T., Brakman, S., & Dietzenbacher, E. (2021). From exports to value added to income: Accounting for bilateral income transfers. Journal of International Economics, 131, 103496.
[18] Wu, Y., Yang, Y., & Mickiewicz, T. (2023). Corruption, the digital sectors, and the profitability of foreign subsidiaries in emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113848.
[19] Wu, Y., Strange, R., & Shirodkar, V. (2021). MNE divestments of foreign affiliates: does the strategic role of the affiliate have an impact? Journal of Business Research, 128, 266-278.
[20] Chang, S. J., Chung, J., & Moon, J. J. (2013). When do wholly owned subsidiaries perform better than joint ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 317-337.
[21] Yang, Y., & Driffield, N. (2022). Leveraging the benefits of location decisions into performance: A global view from matched MNEs. Journal of Business Research, 139, 468-483.
[22] Sampson, T. (2024). Technology transfer in global value chains. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 16(2), 103-146.
[23] Chor, D., Manova, K., & Yu, Z. (2021). Growing like China: Firm performance and global production line position. Journal of International Economics, 130, 103445.
[24] Rungi, A., & Del Prete, D. (2018). The smile curve at the firm level: Where value is added along supply chains. Economics Letters, 164, 38-42.
[25] Meng, B., Ye, M., & Wei, S. J. (2020). Measuring smile curves in global value chains. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(5), 988-1016.
[26] Driffield, N., Love, J. H., & Yang, Y. (2014). Technology sourcing and reverse productivity spillovers in the multinational enterprise: global or regional phenomenon?British Journal of Management, 25, S24-S41.
[27] Bolatto, S., Naghavi, A., Ottaviano, G., & Zajc Kejžar, K. (2023). Intellectual property and the organization of the global value chain. Economica, 90(359), 707-745.
[28] Alfaro, L., Chor, D., Antras, P., & Conconi, P. (2019). Internalizing global value chains: A firm-level analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 127(2), 508-559.
[29] Egger, P. H., Erhardt, K., & Masllorens, G. (2023). Backward versus forward integration of firms in global value chains. European Economic Review, 153, 104401.
[30] Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., & Yuan, W. (2011). Re‐conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal's classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management studies, 48(2), 253-277.
[31] Verbeke, A., & Asmussen, C. G. (2016). Global, local, or regional? The locus of MNE strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 1051-1075.
[32] Contractor, F., Yang, Y., & Gaur, A. S. (2016). Firm-specific intangible assets and subsidiary profitability: The moderating role of distance, ownership strategy and subsidiary experience. Journal of World Business, 51(6), 950-964.
[33] Cui, H., & Mak, Y. T. (2002). The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms. Journal of corporate finance, 8(4), 313-336.
[34] Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, HarperCollinsPublishers.
[35] Yu, H., & Yao, L. (2024). The impact of digital trade regulation on the manufacturing position in the GVC. Economic Modelling, 135, 106712.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





