Empirical Research and Analysis on the Volatility of Chinese Insurance Stocks in the Post-Pandemic Period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202511_6(11).0012Keywords:
Insurance Stocks; Volatility; GARCH Model; COVID-19 Pandemic; Asymmetry.Abstract
The global outbreak of COVID-19 exerted a substantial influence on worldwide financial systems, resulting in marked transformations in the volatility behavior of insurance sector equities in China. Based on an analysis of daily stock prices from five major A-share insurers, including Ping An and China Life, between November 2019 and January 2023, this study applies three types of models-GARCH, EGARCH, and GJR-GARCH-combined with Student's t-distribution and skewed Student's t-distribution. The results show that returns exhibit notable leptokurtosis, fat tails, right-skewness, and strong volatility persistence and clustering. While the EGARCH model provides the best in-sample fit, GJR-GARCH performs better in out-of-sample forecasts. Negative policy events are found to significantly amplify volatility, with clear cross-company differences in asymmetry. These findings suggest persistent and asymmetric volatility in the post-pandemic era, necessitating more sophisticated modelling approaches. Practical implications include the need for tailored risk management strategies and enhanced dynamic monitoring mechanisms for investors, regulators, and insurance companies.
Downloads
References
[1] International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). (2023). Global Insurance Market Report 2023. IAIS. https://www.iais.org/2023/12/iais-global-insurance-market-report-2023-highlights-key-risks-and-trends-facing-the-global-insurance-sector/.
[2] People's Bank of China Financial Stability Analysis Group. (2023). China Financial Stability Report 2023. http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/5177895/index.html.
[3] Su, Z. D. F., Cheng, Z. S., & Wei, Y. J. (2024). Asymmetric volatility spillovers across major global financial markets under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Econometrics, 4(06), 1515-1530.
[4] Babuna, P., Yang, X., Gyilbag, A., Awudi, D. A., Ngmenbelle, D., & Bian, D. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on the insurance industry. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(16), 5766.
[5] Baker, S. R. , Bloom, N. , Davis, S. J. , Kost, K. , & Viratyosin, T. . (2020). The unprecedented stock market reaction to covid-19. Oxford University Press Public Health Emergency Collection, 10(4), 742-758.
[6] Harjoto, M. A., & Rossi, F. (2023). Market reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(1), 173-199.
[7] Ye, R., An, N., **e, Y., Luo, K., & Lin, Y. (2021). An empirical study on the equity performance of China's health insurance companies during the COVID-19 pandemic—based on cases of dominant listed companies. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 663189.
[8] Choo, W.C., Muhammad, I.A., Mat, Y.A. (1999). Performance of garch models in forecasting stock market volatility. Journal of Forecasting, 18(5), 333-343.
[9] Wang, Y. (2011). Volatility analysis and forecasting of China's insurance stocks based on GARCH and CARR models. In Selected Papers of the Annual Conference of the China Insurance Institute 2011. Shaanxi Regulatory Bureau of the China Insurance Regulatory Commission, 295-301.
[10] Endri, E., Aipama, W., Razak, A., Sari, L., & Septiano, R. (2021). Stock price volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic: The GARCH model. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 18(4), 12.
[11] Zhou, H. (2022). Analysis of The Stock Market Risk Spillover Effect of China's Insurance Industry Based on a GARCH-Copula-Covar Model. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 4(7), 57-62.
[12] Nugraha, E. S., Olivia, A., Sudding, F. N. F., & Lestari, K. E. (2025). Estimation of Value at Risk for General Insurance Company Stocks Using the Garch Model. Barekeng: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan, 19(2), 1071-1082.
[13] Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
[14] Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 347-370.
[15] Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The journal of finance, 48(5), 1779-1801.
[16] Lambert, P., & Laurent, S. (2001). Modelling financial time series using GARCH-type models with a skewed student distribution for the innovations (No. UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain).
[17] Yu, X., & Xiao, K. (2024). How does Chinese stock market react to breaking news about COVID-19? Evidence from event study. Heliyon, 10(10).
[18] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1977). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. Judgment under Uncertainty Heuristics and Biases, 414 - 421.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





