Future Banking: An Innovative Credit Product Linking Green Consumption to Carbon Emission Reduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202605_7(5).0008Keywords:
Green Finance; Carbon Emission Reduction; Green Consumption Loan; Carbon Credit Scoring; Blockchain; Big Data Analytics; Machine Learning; Sustainable Banking; Carbon Trading; IoT-based Carbon Tracking.Abstract
Against the backdrop of global carbon neutrality goals and the accelerating green economic transition, green finance has become a critical strategic direction for financial institutions worldwide. However, existing green financial products remain predominantly enterprise-oriented, leaving a significant gap in individual and household green consumption financing. The product features a dual-incentive mechanism whereby users earn green points proportional to their verified carbon emission reductions from purchasing electric vehicles, energy-efficient appliances, and residential photovoltaic systems. These points can be applied to offset loan interest or principal, redeemed at partner merchants, or traded on carbon exchanges. We formalize the green credit scoring model, the carbon-to-points conversion algorithm incorporating machine learning-based dynamic green factors, and the compound interest-adjusted loan deduction framework. A comprehensive financial projection over a five-year horizon demonstrates that the product achieves accounting break-even by Year 2 with approximately 833 active borrowers, yields an internal rate of return (IRR) of approximately 20.5%, and attains a static payback period of 5.83 years. Market analysis confirms strong demand driven by China’s dual-carbon policy, rising consumer environmental awareness, and the expanding green finance ecosystem projected to exceed CNY 3 trillion in individual green consumption by 2030. The proposed framework bridges the “last mile” of green finance by transforming personal carbon reduction into quantifiable financial assets, establishing a sustainable closed loop of “green consumption-carbon reduction-financial reward.”
Downloads
References
[1] G20 Green Finance Study Group, “G20 green finance synthesis report,” G20 Hangzhou Summit, 2016.
[2] United Nations Environment Programme, “Inquiry into the design of a sustainable financial system: The financial system we need,” UNEP, Geneva, 2015.
[3] N. Stern, “The economics of climate change: The Stern Review,” Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007.
[4] People’s Bank of China et al., “Guidelines for establishing the green financial system,” PBOC Document No. 228, 2016.
[5] Y. Wang and Q. Zhi, “The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of crowding-in and crowding-out,” Energy Procedia, vol. 104, pp. 311–316, 2016.
[6] Climate Bonds Initiative, “Global green bond market summary 2024,” CBI Report, 2024.
[7] J. D. Sachs, W. T. Woo, N. Yoshino, and F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, “Handbook of green finance: Energy security and sustainable development,” Springer, 2019.
[8] S. Zhang, Z. Wu, Y. Wang, and Y. Hao, “Fostering green development with green finance: An empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 296, p. 113159, 2021.
[9] T. Dorfleitner, G. Halbritter, and M. Nguyen, “Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility: An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches,” J. Asset Manage., vol. 16, pp. 450–466, 2015.
[10] A. Edmans, “Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices,” J. Financial Econ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 621–640, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





