Study of the Impact of Short-selling Mechanisms on Auditor Behaviour
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202605_7(5).0007Keywords:
Short-selling Intensity; Auditor Behaviour; Professional Competence; Risk Appetite.Abstract
The short-selling mechanism, as a significant external governance mechanism in the capital market, exerts a discernible influence on auditor behavior, thereby emerging as a salient and burgeoning area of academic inquiry. This study utilizes a sample of A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2015 to 2023. Empirical tests are performed on panel data from this period, employing benchmark regression and double mediation effect models. The research empirically examines the impact of short-selling intensity on auditor behavior, specifically the audit fee rate and the severity of audit opinions. Furthermore, the study investigates the dual mediating roles of auditor professional competence and risk preference in this relationship. The results indicate that heightened short-selling intensity indirectly elevates audit fees and exacerbates the severity of audit opinions. This effect is mediated by an increased emphasis on auditors' professional competence and risk appetite, compelling firms to incur higher costs and face more stringent audit assessments. This study contributes to the literature on the economic implications of short-selling and the determinants of auditor behavior. Furthermore, it provides empirical evidence that listed companies can leverage to optimize their auditor selection strategies, while also offering valuable insights for regulators to refine the short-selling mechanism and enhance the governance of the audit market.
Downloads
References
[1] Miller, E. M. (1977). Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinion. Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1151-1168.
[2] Diamond, D. W., & Verreccchia, R. E. (1987). Constraints on Short-Selling and Asset Price Adjustment to Private Information. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(2), 277-311.
[3] Bris, A., Goetzmann, W. N., & Zhu, N. (2007). Efficiency and the Bear: Short Sales and Markets around the World. Journal of Finance, 62(3):1029-1079.
[4] Xu, H. W., & Chen, X. (2021). Did the introduction of financing and bond financing transactions in China promote the pricing efficiency of underlying stocks? --An empirical study based on the double difference model. Management World, 2012(5), 52-61.
[5] Massa, M., Zhang, B., & Zhang, H. (2015). The invisible hand of short selling:Does short selling discipline earnings management? Review of Financial Studies, 28(6), 1701-1736.
[6] Chen, H. L., & Liu, F. (2014). Research on the Governance Effect of Financing and Securities Financing--Based on the Perspective of Corporate Surplus Management. Accounting Research, 2014(9), 45-52.
[7] Chu, J., & Fang, J. X. (2016). Chinese-style financing and securities financing institutional arrangement and the deterioration of stock price crash risk. Economic Research, 2016(5), 143-158.
[8] Hope, O. K., Hu, D. Q., & Zhao, W. Y. (2017). Third-party consequences of short-selling threats: The case of auditor behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63, 479-498.
[9] Huang, C., & Huang, J. (2016). Short selling mechanism, litigation risk and audit fees. Research on Finance and Economics, 2016(5), 77-87.
[10] Zhang, H., & Zhang, L. (2018). Securities financing system and audit quality - A quasi-natural experiment-based analysis. Economic Management, 2018(1), 172-190.
[11] Chen, G. T., Zhu, S., & Huang, X. L. (2014). Alternative study of auditor selection and accounting information quality - based on the perspective of the impact of the robustness principle on credit rating. Auditing Research, 2014(5), 77-85.
[12] Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.
[13] Francis, J. R. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2), 133-151.
[14] DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
[15] Liu, F., & Lin, B. (2002). Accounting firm decoupling and government choice: an explanation. Accounting Research, 2002(2), 9-15.
[16] Li, Y. D., Liu, W. W., & Zhang, Z. H. (2014). Do administrative penalties improve audit quality? --Evidence based on CSRC penalties. Auditing Research, 2014(2), 88-95.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





