Study on the Disparities in Capital Requirements Across Different Stages of Technological Innovation and the Matching Logic of Patient Capital

Authors

  • Danping Qiu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202601_7(1).0020

Keywords:

Technological Innovation; Life Cycle; Patient Capital; Capital Demand; Matching Logic.

Abstract

Technological innovation serves as the core driver of high-quality economic development, exhibiting significant heterogeneity across its entire lifecycle. Correspondingly, capital requirements differ fundamentally in terms of scale, cycle, risk appetite, and other dimensions. Patient capital, centered on long-termism, provides stable financial support for technological innovation by tolerating short-term uncertainty and extending investment cycles. However, the matching logic between patient capital and the various stages of technological innovation has yet to be systematically clarified.This study, grounded in the theory of the technological innovation lifecycle, categorizes the innovation process into four distinct phases: basic research, applied development, commercialization, and industrial expansion. It systematically analyzes the capital demand characteristics of each phase. Building upon this foundation, a matching analysis framework for patient capital and different stages of technological innovation is constructed across four dimensions: scale of capital supply, risk-sharing mechanisms, return orientation, and value-added provision. Finally, drawing on case studies from representative industries, differentiated patient capital matching strategies are proposed.The findings offer theoretical insights and practical implications for optimizing innovation capital allocation efficiency and enabling patient capital to precisely empower technological innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li G, Liu Y, Zhang Q. Venture capital shareholding, tolerance for technological innovation failure, and technological innovation performance: evidence from China[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2024, 31(5): 876-893.

[2] Klingler-Vidra R. When venture capital is patient capital: seed funding as a source of patient capital for high-growth companies[J]. Socio-Economic Review, 2016, 14(4): 691-708.

[3] Fan W, Wu H, Liu Y. Does digital finance induce improved financing for green technological innovation in China?[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 2022(1): 6138422.

[4] Barrot J N. Investor horizon and the life cycle of innovative firms: Evidence from venture capital[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(9): 3021-3043.

[5] Geng X, Liu J, Dai M. How government-guided funds cultivate and expand patient capital in China's GEM market?[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025: 104871.

[6] Li G, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. Can government-guided funds promote corporate technology innovation? Evidence from the new energy automobile industry[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, 96: 103667.

[7] Schumpeter J A. 1912. The Theory of Economic Development[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[8] Rothwell R, Zegveld W. 1985. Reindusdalization and Technology[M]. London:Logman Group Limited.

[9] Lei J , Liu Y , Qi Y ,et al.40 Years of Technological Innovation in China: A Review of the Four-Stage Climbing Track[J].Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 2019, 04(03):287-308.DOI:10.1142/S2424862219500088.

[10] Averch H A. Measuring the cost‐efficiency of basic research investment: Input‐output approaches[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1987, 6(3): 342-361.

[11] Murray G. Early-stage venture capital funds, scale economies and public support[J]. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 1999, 1(4): 351-384.

[12] Botazzi L, Da Rin M, Van Ours J, et al. Venture capital in Europe and the financing of innovative companies[J]. Economic Policy, 2002, 17(34): 229-269.

[13] Powell D M, Fu R, Horowitz K, et al. The capital intensity of photovoltaics manufacturing: barrier to scale and opportunity for innovation[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8(12): 3395-3408.

[14] Basore P. The Capital Intensity of Photovoltaics Manufacturing[R]. National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2015.

[15] Amankwah‐Amoah J. Technological revolution, sustainability, and development in Africa: Overview, emerging issues, and challenges[J]. Sustainable Development, 2019, 27(5): 910-922.

[16] Mariana Mazzucato,“Financing Innovation:Creative Destruction vs.Destructive Creation”,in Mariana Mazzucato(ed.),Special Issue of Industrial and Corporate Change,Vol.22,No.4,2013,pp.851-67.

[17] Deeg R, Hardie I, Maxfield S. What is patient capital, and where does it exist?[J]. Socio-Economic Review, 2016, 14(4): 615-625.

[18] Hong Y, Jiang J. Cultivating and Strengthening Patient Capital to Promote the Development of New Quality Productive Forces[J]. Frontiers of Economics in China, 2025, 20(3): 376-393.

[19] Dafe F, Upadhyaya R. Varieties of capitalism and patient capital in developing and emerging economies: evidence from Kenya[J]. Socio-Economic Review, 2025, 23(4): 2167-2188.

[20] Ang R, Chng V. Value investing in growth companies: how to spot high growth businesses and generate 40% to 400% investment returns[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

[21] Clifford B D. Developing an Investment Philosophy: A Guide to the Warren Buffet Model[J]. 2002.

[22] Shah S. The principal-agent problem in finance[J]. CFA Institute Research Foundation L2014-1, 2014.

[23] PFEFFER J,SALANCIK G R,1978.The external control of organizations:a resource dependence perspective[M].New York:Harper&Row.

[24] Luukkonen T, Deschryvere M, Bertoni F. The value added by government venture capital funds compared with independent venture capital funds[J]. Technovation, 2013, 33(4-5): 154-162.

[25] Owen R, North D, Mac an Bhaird C. The role of government venture capital funds: Recent lessons from the UK experience[J]. Strategic Change, 2019, 28(1): 69-82.

[26] Naczyk M. Creating French-style pension funds: Business, labour and the battle over patient capital[J]. Journal of European social policy, 2016, 26(3): 205-218.

[27] Metrick A, Yasuda A. Venture capital and other private equity: a survey[J]. European Financial Management, 2011, 17(4): 619-654.

[28] Brander J A, Egan E, Hellmann T F. Government sponsored versus private venture capital: Canadian evidence[M]//International differences in entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, 2010: 275-320.

[29] Brander J A, Amit R, Antweiler W. Venture‐capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value‐added hypothesis[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2002, 11(3): 423-452.

[30] Harrison R T, Botelho T, Mason C M. Patient capital in entrepreneurial finance: a reassessment of the role of business angel investors[J]. Socio-Economic Review, 2016, 14(4): 669-689.

[31] David P A, Mowery D, Steinmueller W E. Analysing the economic payoffs from basic research[J]. Economics of innovation and New Technology, 1992, 2(1): 73-90.

[32] Wang J, Yang Y, Li L. Digital Infrastructure Construction, Patient Capital, and Corporate Digital Technology Innovation[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2025: 109243.

[33] Heinonen T. Management of innovation in academia: going beyond traditional technology transfer[J]. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2015, 10(2): 198-210.

[34] Bradley S R, Hayter C S, Link A N. Models and methods of university technology transfer[J]. Foundations and trends in Entrepreneurship, 2013, 9(6): 571-650.

[35] Van Der Schans D, Owen R, Hussain J. Examining the patient capital problem for green technology start-up and scale-up businesses[J]. Venture Capital, 2025: 1-38.

[36] Kingsley G, Bozeman B, Coker K. Technology transfer and absorption: an ‘R & D value-mapping’approach to evaluation[J]. Research policy, 1996, 25(6): 967-995.

[37] Lin J Y, Wang Y. The new structural economics: Patient capital as a comparative advantage[J]. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development (2017) Volume, 2017, 1: 4-23.

[38] Du J, Li P, Guo Q, et al. Measuring the knowledge translation and convergence in pharmaceutical innovation by funding-science-technology-innovation linkages analysis[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 132-148.

[39] Mazzucato M, MacFarlane L. Patient finance for innovation-driven growth[J]. 2018.

[40] Feldman M P. The geography of innovation[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

[41] Luong N, Arnold Z, Murphy B. Understanding Chinese government guidance funds[J]. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, March, 2021, 2(5.3): 1.

[42] Pan F, Zhang F, Wu F. State-led financialization in China: The case of the government-guided investment fund[J]. The China Quarterly, 2021, 247: 749-772.

[43] Gotoh F. Patient capital, corporate governance and investment in digital innovation: what can Japan learn from South Korea’s experience?[J]. The Pacific Review, 2025: 1-30.

[44] Utterback J M , Abernathy W J .A dynamic model of process and product innovation[J].Omega, 1975, 3(6):639-656.DOI:10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7.

[45] Rai A K. Regulating scientific research: Intellectual property rights and the norms of science[J]. Nw. UL Rev., 1999, 94: 77.

[46] Brandenburg R G, Stedry A C. Toward a multi‐stage information conversion model of the research and development process[J]. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1966, 13(2): 129-146.

[47] Georgiou O, Maksymenko M, Russo S. Technology Commercialization[M]//R&D Management and Technology Commercialization: Practical Concepts, Innovation, and Case Studies. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025: 141-175.

[48] Patience G S, Boffito D C. Distributed production: Scale‐up vs experience[J]. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing, 2020, 2(2): e10039.

[49] Thompson‐Spain A, Bunds K S, Larson L, et al. Patient capital and no net loss: Applying institutional theory to understand publicly‐owned mitigation banking in an urban context at a United States port[J]. Public Administration, 2025, 103(1): 220-249.

[50] Oh S, Jang P, Kwak G. Enhancing the efficiency of governmental intervention in the venture capital market: The monitoring effect[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2022, 75: 450-463.

[51] Xiaobo W U, Xinyue Z, Huajie S. Business Model Innovation in China’s Semiconductor Industry: A Pathway to Technological Breakthrough[J]. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2023, 17(4).

[52] Tong X, Wan X. National industrial investment fund and China's integrated circuit industry technology innovation[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2023, 8(1): 100319.

[53] Liu B. National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund and enterprise technological innovation: evidence from China[J]. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 2024, 18(1): 63-84.

[54] Meng B, Wu X. Betting Big on Chips: Unraveling Governance Challenges in China's National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund [J]. 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Qiu, D. (2026). Study on the Disparities in Capital Requirements Across Different Stages of Technological Innovation and the Matching Logic of Patient Capital. Frontiers in Economics and Management, 7(1), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202601_7(1).0020