The Impact of the Revised Ballast Water Management Convention on Ship Compliance Management

Authors

  • Rongjun Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202508_6(8).0024

Keywords:

Ballast Water Management; Convention Revision; Ship Compliance; Impact; Countermeasures.

Abstract

With the growing global awareness of marine ecological protection and the rapid development of the shipping industry, the issue of invasive species caused by ship ballast water has attracted increasing attention. The original Ballast Water Management Convention has become inadequate in meeting practical needs regarding ecological control standards and the compatibility of technical specifications, prompting its revision. Against this backdrop, this paper systematically examines the specific impacts of the revised convention on the validity of ship certificates, the adaptability of ballast water management plans, standards for equipment maintenance and operational procedures, the standardization of crew operational records, and the shore-based support systems of shipowners. On this basis, targeted countermeasures are proposed from four dimensions: convention interpretation, system adjustment, equipment training, and shore-based evaluation. The study aims to provide both theoretical insights and practical guidance for shipping enterprises to meet the new regulatory requirements and enhance their compliance management standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Carlton, J.T.; Geller, J.B. Ecological roulette-the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 1993, 261, 78–82.

[2] Hewitt, C.; Gollasch, S.; Minchin, D. The vessel as a vector-biofouling, ballast water and sediments. In Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems: Ecological, Management, and Geographic Perspectives; Rilov, G., Crooks, J.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 117–131.

[3] Molnar, J.L.; Gamboa, R.L.; Revenga, C.; Spalding, M.D. Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 485–492.

[4] Pam, E.D.; Li, K.X.; Wall, A.; Yang, Z.; Wang, J. A subjective approach for ballast water risk estimation. Ocean Eng. 2013, 61, 66–76.

[5] Hewitt, C.; Campbell, M. The relative contribution of vectors to the introduction and translocation of invasive marine species. Prod. Aust. Gov. 2010, 1–56. Available online: https://www.marinepests.gov.au/what-we-do/research/vectors-introduction-translocation (accessed on 19 March 2022).

[6] International Maritime Organization (IMO)-Ballast Water as a Vector. Available online: https://archive.iwlearn.net/globallast.imo.org/ballast-water-as-a-vector/index.html (accessed on 19 March 2022).

[7] ABS-Guide for Ballast Water Exchange. 2020. Available online: https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/other/171_ballast_Water_Exchange_2016/bwe-guide-june20.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2022).

[8] Hulme, P.E. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 10–18.

[9] Liu, T.K.; Wang, Y.C.; Su, P.H. Implementing the ballast water management convention: Taiwan’s experience and challenges in the early stage. Mar. Policy 2019, 109, 103706.

[10] IUCN. IUCN Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss Caused by Alien Invasive Species. 2000. Available online: https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/Rep-2000-052.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2022).

Downloads

Published

2025-08-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, R. (2025). The Impact of the Revised Ballast Water Management Convention on Ship Compliance Management. Frontiers in Economics and Management, 6(8), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202508_6(8).0024